Analog and semi-analog synths in the database

The hardware synth revival is the loudest corner of the keyboard market, and the least documented: manufacturers publish voice counts and keybeds in different places, prices move constantly, and the difference between "analog" and "analog-modelled" is rarely spelled out in listings. We hold 37 instruments across 10 makers - Moog, Sequential, Oberheim, Behringer, Waldorf, UDO Audio, ASM, Expressive E, Teenage Engineering, Rhodes - with the specifications their builders document.

How to read a synth spec sheet

Polyphony is not a keyboard spec here. On a piano, 192 voices means the pedal will not cut off. On a synth it means "how many notes sound at once", so 1 is a mono synth, 5 is a five-voice poly and 8 is a modest poly - a completely different instrument category in each case. The tables below carry that number for every model we hold, which is the fastest filter on the whole market.

Analog, modelled or hybrid. Our engine field records what the maker says is inside: an analogue voice architecture, a digital model of one, or a hybrid of both. Where a manufacturer does not document it, the model page says so rather than guessing.

Moog

10 models

Documented voices 1–8 · weight 7.3–20.4 kg.

ModelReleasedKeysPolyphonyAftertouchWeightStatus
Moog Little PhattyMar 2006371—9.9 kgDiscontinued (legacy)
Moog Sub PhattyJan 2013251—7.48 kgDiscontinued (legacy)
Moog Subsequent 37Aug 201737—yes—Current
Moog GrandmotherMay 201832——7.25 kgCurrent
Moog OneOct 2018618yes20.4 kgCurrent
Moog MatriarchApr 2019491yes (channel aftertouch)13.61 kgCurrent
Moog Subsequent 25Jan 2020252——Discontinued
Moog Minimoog Model DNov 2022441—14.5 kgCurrent
Moog MuseJul 2024618yes14.55 kgCurrent
Moog MessengerMay 2025321——Current

Sequential

8 models

Documented voices 1–16 · weight 7.3–14.5 kg.

ModelReleasedKeysPolyphonyAftertouchWeightStatus
Sequential Prophet-62015496yes (channel aftertouch)9.5 kgCurrent
Sequential OB-62016496yes (channel aftertouch)9.5 kgCurrent
Sequential Prophet Rev220176116yes9.3 kgCurrent
Sequential Prophet X2018618yes10.89 kgDiscontinued (legacy)
Sequential Pro 32020371yes7.25 kgCurrent
Sequential Prophet-52020615yes14.51 kgCurrent
Sequential Take 52021445yes (channel aftertouch)7.7 kgCurrent
Sequential Trigon-6Nov 2022496yes9.5 kgCurrent

Oberheim

2 models

Documented voices 5–8 · weight 7.7–14.7 kg.

ModelReleasedKeysPolyphonyAftertouchWeightStatus
Oberheim OB-X8Jul 2022618yes14.74 kgCurrent
Oberheim TEO-5May 2024445yes (channel aftertouch)7.71 kgCurrent

Behringer

8 models

Documented voices 2–32 · weight 4.6–11.7 kg.

ModelReleasedKeysPolyphonyAftertouchWeightStatus
Behringer DeepMind 12Jul 20164912yes8.4 kgCurrent
Behringer DeepMind 6Apr 2017376yes6.9 kgCurrent
Behringer OdysseyJan 2019372—8.1 kgCurrent
Behringer Poly DNov 2019374—7.3 kgCurrent
Behringer MonoPolyNov 2020374—10.3 kgCurrent
Behringer MS-1 MK IIMar 20233232—4.6 kgCurrent
Behringer PRO-800Apr 2023—8——Current
Behringer UB-XaNov 20236116polyphonic11.7 kgCurrent

Waldorf

1 models

Documented voices 16 · weight 14 kg.

ModelReleasedKeysPolyphonyAftertouchWeightStatus
Waldorf Iridium KeyboardMar 20224916polyphonic14 kgCurrent

UDO Audio

2 models

Documented voices 12–20 · weight 9.2–14.5 kg.

ModelReleasedKeysPolyphonyAftertouchWeightStatus
UDO Audio Super 6Sep 20204912yes9.2 kgCurrent
UDO Audio Super GeminiMay 20236120polyphonic14.5 kgCurrent

ASM

3 models

Documented voices 8–16 · weight 3.4–13.3 kg.

ModelReleasedKeysPolyphonyAftertouchWeightStatus
ASM Hydrasynth Keyboard2019498polyphonic10 kgCurrent
ASM Hydrasynth Deluxe20217316polyphonic13.3 kgCurrent
ASM Hydrasynth ExplorerSep 2021378polyphonic3.4 kgCurrent

Expressive E

1 models

Documented voices 24 · weight 8.3 kg.

ModelReleasedKeysPolyphonyAftertouchWeightStatus
Expressive E OsmoseNov 20194924yes8.3 kgCurrent

Teenage Engineering

1 models

Documented voices 24 · weight 0.9 kg.

ModelReleasedKeysPolyphonyAftertouchWeightStatus
Teenage Engineering OP-XYNov 20242424—0.9 kgCurrent

Rhodes

1 models

Documented weight 34 kg.

ModelReleasedKeysPolyphonyAftertouchWeightStatus
Rhodes MK8202173——34 kgCurrent

The line between mono and poly

Documented single-voice (mono/paraphonic) instruments in the database: Little Phatty, Sub Phatty, Matriarch, Pro 3, Minimoog Model D, Messenger. One note at a time is a playing style, not a limitation to fix - but it decides what music you can make with it, so it belongs in the first paragraph of any listing.

Everything else in the tables above is polyphonic, from five-voice classics to 32-voice instruments. The voice count is the price ladder in this market more reliably than the brand name.

New or used

33 of the 37 instruments above are still listed as current by their makers; the rest are withdrawn and appear with a used-market score where we hold one, in the discontinued picks ranking. Synths hold value differently from pianos: a discontinued analogue classic often sells above its launch price, so a used score here is a statement about the instrument, not a discount.

For the difference between these instruments and the digital piano market, see the P-series ladder; for hybrid stage instruments that combine both worlds, the Nord and Sequential brand pages list what we hold.

Every maker at a glance - the full map of lines, rungs and price bands - is on the model ladders overview.

Frequently asked questions

Which synths in the database are monophonic?

The table rows with a polyphony of 1 - Little Phatty, Sub Phatty, Matriarch, Pro 3, Minimoog Model D, Messenger. Every other instrument in the tables above sounds more than one note at a time.

Does a higher voice count make a synth better?

No - it changes what you can play. Mono instruments are the classic lead and bass machines, and many five-voice classics are more desirable today than 16-voice budget synths. Our score field weighs the instrument class rather than the number.

Are these all analogue?

Not all: the engine field on each model page records what the maker documents, including digital and hybrid architectures. Listings that call everything "analog" are usually making a marketing claim, not a specification.

Why do you not list original 1970s models?

Because the database only lists instruments whose specifications the manufacturer still documents. Where a maker publishes an archive for an old model, it is in; where the only sources are fan pages and forum threads, it is out.